News

People who mocked God and died some few moments later

Published

2 years ago

June 6, 2024

Spread the love

On my daily devotional with the Lord, I found out in Galatians 6:7 “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows” (New International Version)

To mock someone, from oxford languages means, an absurd misrepresentation or imitation of something

From the above scripture to “mock” God is to act as if we know better than the Creator. It’s an insult to God’s wisdom and authority. When we mock God, we demonstrate an arrogant heart attitude that assumes God doesn’t see or care about our actions. Ultimately, mocking God is duplicitous and deceitful. It’s asserting one thing while embodying another.

Here are some people who dared the existence of God and were found out.

Stephen Hawking

God doesn’t exist, aliens do exist, and time travel might still be possible, Stephen Hawking says in a book he wrote before his death.

Released on Tuesday, the theoretical physicist and British icon says in Brief Answers to the Big Questions: “There is no God. No one directs the universe.

“For centuries, it was believed that disabled people like me were living under a curse that was inflicted by God. I prefer to think that everything can be explained another way, by the laws of nature.”

John Lennon (Singer)

Christianity will end, it will disappear. I do not have to argue about that. I am certain. Jesus was ok, but his subjects were too simple, today we are more famous than Him’ (1966). Lennon, after saying that the Beatles were more famous than Jesus Christ, was shot six times, and he died

Tancredo Neves (President of Brazil)

During the Presidential campaign, he said if he got 500,000 votes from his party, not even God would remove him from Presidency. Sure, he got the votes, but he got sick a day before being made President, then he died.

Cazuza (Bi-sexual Brazilian composer, singer and poet)

During A show in Canecio (Rio de Janeiro) While smoking his cigarette, he puffed out some smoke into the air and said: “God, that’s for you.” He died at the age of 32 of LUNG CANCER in a horrible manner.

Thomas Andrews

After the construction of Titanic, a reporter asked him how safe the Titanic would be. With an ironic tone he said: “Not even God can sink it.” The result: I think you all know what happened to the Titanic.

Marilyn Monroe (Actress)

She was visited by Billy Graham during a presentation of a show. He said the Spirit of God had sent him to preach to her. After hearing what the Preacher had to say, she said: “I don’t need your Jesus”. A week later, she was found dead in her apartment.

Bon Scott (Singer)

The ex-vocalist of the AC/DC. On one of his 1979 songs he sang: ‘Don’t stop me; I’m going down all the way, down the highway to hell’. On the 19th of February 1980, Bon Scott was found dead, he had been choked by his own vomit.

Christine Hewitt (Jamaican Journalist and entertainer)

She said the Bible (Word of God) was the worst book ever written. In June 2006 she was found burnt beyond recognition in her motor vehicle. Many more important people have forgotten that there is no other name that was given so much authority as the name of Jesus.

Campinas (IN 2005)

In Campinas, Brazil, a group of friends, drunk, went to pick up a friend. The mother accompanied her to the car and was so worried about the drunkenness of her friends and she said to the daughter holding her hand, who was already seated in the car: “My Daughter, Go with God and May He Protect You.

“She responded: “Only If He (God) Travels in the Trunk, Cause Inside Here. It’s Already Full.” Hours later, news came by that they had been involved in a fatal accident, everyone had died, the car could not be recognized what type of car it had been, but surprisingly, the trunk was intact.

The People of Brazil

They mocked God during their Rio Carnival Parade and experienced a humongous flood after. Most people lost their lives.

God exist, trust in Him and worship Him alone and your life will be great. Amen

News

Ghana Plans New Nationwide SIM Card Re-Registration in 2026

Published

4 days ago

March 25, 2026

Samuel Kobina Amu

Spread the love

Ghana’s government, through the Ministry of Communications, Digital Technology and Innovations and the National Communications Authority (NCA), has officially approved and is preparing a new nationwide SIM card registration exercise scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2026 (with some indications of rollout extending into mid-year).

Officials describe it not merely as a “re-registration” but as a fresh, comprehensive SIM/number registration to create a clean, reliable database—citing serious flaws in the previous 2021–2023 exercise conducted under the prior administration. Why This Exercise?

Previous process deemed ineffective: President John Dramani Mahama and Communications Minister Samuel Nartey George (Sam George) have publicly stated that the last registration produced unreliable data, with weak biometrics, fake Ghana Cards, multiple SIMs linked to single IDs, and poor integration with the National Identification Authority (NIA) database. A sample audit of ~2.3 million records reportedly showed zero successful full biometric matches in some checks.
Rising fraud and security concerns: Authorities link unverified or poorly registered SIMs to increased SIM-swap fraud, mobile money (MoMo) scams, identity theft, and SIM-box operations used for criminal activities. The new system aims to curb these by tying every phone number directly to verified biometric Ghana Card data.
Broader goals: Strengthen national digital security, enable better tracking of devices via a new Central Equipment Identity Register (CEIR) for blocking stolen phones across networks, introduce a “primary number” security feature (to alert users if their ID is used elsewhere), and build public confidence in the telecom ecosystem.

Key Features of the 2026 Exercise

Full integration with Ghana Card: Live biometric verification (fingerprints, facial, etc.) against the NIA database. Focus shifts from registering SIM cards to registering individual phone numbers.

Convenience-focused design: Emphasis on self-service portals, digital/app-based registration, USSD/short-code options, and updates without long queues (lessons from past exercises). No physical visits required for simple updates in many cases.

Additional security layers:
- Linkage to IMEI (device identifier) for better device tracking.
- Central NCA repository for all registration records.
- Provisions for “genuine need” limits on multiple SIMs per person.
- Stricter user consent and data protection measures.

Cost: Free for subscribers/taxpayers. Telecom companies (telcos like MTN) will bear the costs, though some analysts worry these may eventually be passed on indirectly.
“Final” exercise?: Minister Sam George has assured Ghanaians this will be the last such comprehensive registration if executed properly, with a robust legal framework (new Legislative Instrument) in place first.

Timeline and Rollout

Cabinet approved the process in early March 2026.
Procurement of service providers is underway.
Official start expected in Q1 2026, with a possible phased approach.
Existing SIMs will likely have a grace period (details still emerging) before any deactivation for non-compliance.

Reactions and Criticisms

Support: From NCA, telcos (e.g., MTN Ghana backs a phased approach for security), and the government. Seen as necessary to modernize the system and fight fraud.
Skepticism and opposition:
- Think tank IMANI Ghana warns of repeating 15+ years of policy failures: poor inter-agency coordination, data protection risks, procurement opacity (“katanomics”), and unnecessary blanket re-collection when ~80% of SIMs may already be linkable. They advocate a targeted “verify-and-forget” model instead of full re-registration to minimize disruption and cost.
  
  modernghana.com
- Concerns over potential economic impact (past exercises deactivated millions of SIMs and froze mobile money), rural access challenges, elderly/digital literacy issues, and privacy risks from a centralized biometric database.

- Political undertones: Some view it as the new NDC administration resetting the previous NPP-era process; others question the frequency (this would be the third major exercise in ~15 years).

The NCA and Ministry have held stakeholder engagements (including with telcos and data protection bodies) and promise robust privacy safeguards, with the Data Protection Commission involved. This fits Ghana’s ongoing push for a more secure digital identity ecosystem, similar to efforts in other countries linking mobile numbers to national IDs.

However, success will depend on execution: transparent procurement, genuine interoperability between NCA/NIA systems, minimal disruption to users, and strong independent oversight.If you’d like more on specific aspects—like how the process might work for individuals, potential impacts on mobile money, comparisons to past exercises, or live updates as the rollout details emerge—let me know!

News

Ghana Pushes UN Resolution on Transatlantic Slave Trade as Gravest Crime

Published

4 days ago

March 25, 2026

Samuel Kobina Amu

Spread the love

Ghana is tabling a draft resolution at the UN General Assembly today (March 25, 2026), coinciding with the International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade. The proposal, titled “Declaration of the Trafficking of Enslaved Africans and Racialised Chattel Enslavement of Africans as the Gravest Crime Against Humanity”, seeks formal UN recognition of the transatlantic slave trade as the gravest crime in human history, citing its massive scale, centuries-long duration, legal institutionalization, and lasting intergenerational effects.

Key Elements of the Resolution

Ghana’s President John Dramani Mahama (who pledged this during his 2025 UNGA address) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs frame it as a step toward “truth, moral clarity,” reparatory justice, and structured dialogue on repair—not accusation. It builds on prior acknowledgments (e.g., the 2001 Durban Declaration) but pushes for stronger language and ties it to calls for apologies, education/skills programs, return of artifacts, and compensation, particularly supporting CARICOM-led reparations efforts.

Backers: Strong support from the African Union (around 40 members as AU Champion on Reparations), Caribbean states, and some Latin American countries (e.g., Brazil has signaled backing). Ghana’s Permanent Representative Samuel Yao Kumah has urged member states to back it as an act of historical accountability.
Opposition/Criticism: Some European governments resist, arguing modern states bear no legal liability for actions centuries ago and that labeling it the singular “gravest” crime invites comparisons with other atrocities (e.g., Holocaust, genocides, other slaveries). Critics question why it specifies “transatlantic” when slavery existed widely across history and continents, including intra-African involvement in the trade.

Historical Context

The transatlantic slave trade (roughly 16th–19th centuries) forcibly transported an estimated 12–15 million Africans across the Atlantic, with millions more dying en route or in the Middle Passage. European powers (Portugal, Britain, France, Spain, Netherlands, etc.) drove the demand for plantation labor in the Americas, while African kingdoms and merchants supplied captives through warfare and raids. It was a brutal, racialized chattel system with profound demographic, economic, and cultural impacts on Africa, the Americas, and the African diaspora.

The UN General Assembly can adopt such resolutions by simple majority; they are symbolic and non-binding, carrying moral weight but no enforceable legal obligations or automatic reparations. Similar past efforts (e.g., Durban process) have highlighted slavery as a crime against humanity without triggering widespread compensation.

Broader ImplicationsThis fits into ongoing global debates on historical injustice, reparations, and decolonization narratives. Proponents see it as correcting Eurocentric histories and addressing persistent inequalities. Skeptics argue it risks selective memory—ignoring Arab slave trades, Ottoman slavery, Asian systems, or African agency—and could fuel division rather than universal human rights focus. Legally, crimes against humanity concepts (codified post-WWII) are typically applied prospectively; retroactive “gravest crime” declarations remain political statements.As of today, the vote is imminent or underway.

Expect strong African/Caribbean yes votes, possible abstentions or no’s from parts of Europe and others wary of precedent. Outcomes will likely be symbolic progress for the reparations movement rather than immediate material change. If you’re following the live developments or want deeper dives into specific aspects (e.g., estimated death tolls, economic legacies, or counterarguments on comparative atrocities), let me know for more details.

News

Ghana Debates President’s Use of Brother’s Private Jet for Seoul Trip

Published

2 weeks ago

March 16, 2026

Samuel Kobina Amu

Bombardier Global 6500 (Credit: NNehring, Getty Images)

Spread the love

President John Dramani Mahama’s recent official trip to Seoul, South Korea, has ignited widespread public and political debate in Ghana. The controversy centers on his use of a private jet owned by his younger brother, prominent businessman Ibrahim Mahama, rather than a commercial flight or the state’s aircraft.

Background of the Trip

President Mahama traveled to South Korea in early March 2026 to strengthen bilateral ties between the two nations. The visit included high-level discussions with South Korean leadership, signing memoranda of understanding (MoUs), and participation in a ceremony at Hyundai Heavy Industries where a vessel was renamed in honor of Ghana (reported as “Asharami Ghana”).

The trip was described as historic in some reports, aimed at boosting economic and diplomatic relations. South Korea has emerged as a key partner for Ghana in areas like infrastructure, trade, and potentially visa arrangements.

Upon arrival in Seoul, visuals circulated online showing the President disembarking from a Bombardier Global 6500 private jet branded “Dzata.” This aircraft, valued at around $70 million and newly acquired, belongs to Ibrahim Mahama, one of West Africa’s leading entrepreneurs with interests in mining, construction, agriculture, and other sectors.

The Controversy Unfolds

The revelation sparked immediate backlash, particularly from opposition figures in the New Patriotic Party (NPP). Critics argued that using a family member’s private jet for official state travel raises serious concerns about:

- Conflict of interest — A close relative providing such a resource could imply undue influence or favoritism.
- Breach of ethics — Some, including the MP for Walewale, Abdul Kabiru Tiah Mahama, claimed it violates the Code of Conduct for public officials, which the President himself has promoted. They suggested he should have opted for commercial flights to avoid any perception of impropriety.
- Transparency and cost to taxpayers — Questions arose about whether any indirect benefits accrue to the President’s family or if state funds subtly cover related expenses beyond what’s disclosed.

Public reactions, captured in vox pops and social media, were divided. Some Ghanaians saw nothing wrong with a president borrowing from family, comparing it to everyday use of relatives’ resources. Others demanded accountability, labeling it hypocritical or extravagant amid economic challenges. Legal and governance experts weighed in. Lawyer Kofi Bentil argued it was inappropriate for official duties. Civil society voices called for probes into potential hidden costs.

Government and Supporters’ Defense

The Presidency and allies pushed back strongly. Key points include:

- Cost savings — Government Communications Minister Felix Ofosu Kwakye clarified that the state only covers fuel and landing fees—no rental or charter costs are paid to Ibrahim Mahama. This avoids the high expense of hiring a commercial private jet for long-haul flights.
- Practical necessity — Ghana’s official presidential aircraft, the Dassault Falcon 900, lacks the range for non-stop travel to East Asia and requires multiple refueling stops, making it inefficient. The Falcon has faced maintenance issues in the past.
- No violation — Supporters, including some NDC figures like Inusah Fuseini, maintained there’s nothing inherently wrong with family assistance if transparent and cost-effective. Executive Secretary Dr. Callistus Mahama and others emphasized openness in the arrangement.
- Precedent and context — Private resources have been used before for presidential travel when state assets are unavailable.

The government has indicated plans to acquire a more suitable dedicated presidential aircraft by late 2026 to address long-term logistics.

Broader Implications

This episode highlights ongoing tensions in Ghanaian politics around family influence, public resource use, and perceptions of elite privilege. While the President’s trip achieved diplomatic gains—including progress toward visa waivers and economic partnerships—the jet controversy overshadowed these outcomes in domestic discourse.

As debates continue on social media, talk shows, and in Parliament, the incident underscores the scrutiny presidents face in balancing practical governance needs with ethical optics. Whether it leads to formal inquiries or fades as partisan noise remains to be seen, but it has reignited conversations about transparency in high office.

For many Ghanaians, the core question persists: Is family support a pragmatic solution or a slippery slope? The answer may shape public trust in leadership for years to come.